No movies have inspired me to write about them lately so to keep the blog current, here are two stories that cought my eye today.
Archbishop: HIV-infected condoms sent to kill Africans
Mozambique's Roman Catholic archbishop has accused European condom manufacturers of deliberately infecting their products with HIV "in order to finish quickly the African people".
The archbishop of Maputo, Francisco Chimoio, told the BBC that he had specific information about a plot to kill off Africans. "I know that there are two countries in Europe ... making condoms with the virus, on purpose," he alleged. But he refused to name the countries.
He added: "They want to finish with the African people. This is the programme. They want to colonise until up to now. If we are not careful we will finish in one century's time."
His views have prompted outrage from activists trying to combat HIV/Aids and help sufferers. They described the statements as ridiculous. Medical specialists said it was impossible for the Aids virus to live inside condoms for any length of time.
Marcella Mahanjane, a prominent Mozambican activist, told the BBC that there was no evidence to back the archbishop's claims. "We've been using condoms for years now, and we still find them safe," she said. Nonetheless the archbishop's comments are likely to undermine the Mozambique government's campaign to educate people about the disease in a country where about one in six of the 19-million citizens are HIV-positive and about 500 people are infected each day.
Health specialists say that views contrary to scientific orthodoxy on HIV/Aids are frequently seized upon by people looking for a reason not to use condoms or by those reluctant to take the antiretroviral drugs.
The archbishop is widely respected in Mozambique, in part because of the leading role he played in brokering a peace deal to end a 16-year civil war in 1992.
The Catholic church has resisted pressure to amend its opposition to the use of condoms despite the HIV/Aids pandemic. Chimoio told the BBC that abstinence was the best way to fight HIV/Aids.
"If we want to change the situation to face HIV/Aids it's necessary to have a new mentality. If we don't change [that] mentality we'll be finished quickly," he said. "It means marriage, people being faithful to their wives ... [and] young people must be abstaining from sexual relations."
The archbishop's comments echo the scepticism over HIV/Aids found among leaders in other parts of Africa, notably neighbouring South Africa where President Thabo Mbeki has questioned the link between HIV and Aids and suggested that antiretroviral drugs are so poisonous they are more dangerous than the disease.
Aids education has been undermined in other parts of the continent by leaders who back cures that show no signs of overcoming HIV. The Gambia's President, Yahya Jammeh, claims to be able to cure the disease by rubbing a green herbal potion into people's bodies. Patients have been referred to the president by the country's health ministry. A United Nations Aids official who criticised Jammeh's claims was expelled from The Gambia. - Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2007
Dinnertime tale lands Fox pundit in race row
One of Rupert Murdoch's leading pundits on the Fox News television channel, Bill O'Reilly, has become embroiled in the latest public row over the depiction of black people in the mainstream media.
O'Reilly, who describes himself as a populist and traditionalist, has been accused of "velvet racism" for comments on his radio show about the famous Harlem restaurant Sylvia's. The remarks referred to a dinner the commentator had enjoyed there with the Reverend Al Sharpton, the black preacher and political leader.
The dinner itself passed off uneventfully, by all accounts. But when O'Reilly reminisced about the evening he portrayed it in a way that set alarm bells ringing across the blogosphere.
He started out by praising the staff and largely black clientele of the restaurant for being "very, very nice" and "tremendously respectful". Warming to his theme, he said: "I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks."
To compound matters, in a separate radio broadcast he referred to the dinner again. "There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea.' You know, it was like going into an Italian restaurant in an all-white suburb. People were sitting there, and they were ordering and having fun. And there wasn't any kind of craziness at all."
O'Reilly insists he was making positive points about the American melting pot -- a common theme of his radio and television shows in which he frequently lambasts "race-based" activists such as Sharpton. But the tone of surprise in his voice, and the implication that he had previously assumed black restaurants to be less civilised than their white counterparts, has caused outrage. As a black law professor, Anita Allen of Pennsylvania University, put it to ABC News: "He doesn't realise dinner can be a civilised affair and we do use table napkins."
The furore is the latest evidence that previously untouchable right-wing talkshow hosts are now vulnerable to scrutiny as a result of blogs. The pundit's comments were publicised by the liberal monitoring website Media Matters, which pointed to previous O'Reilly remarks including a 2005 broadcast in which he said many poor residents of New Orleans failed to evacuate the hurricane-stricken city because "they were drug-addicted".
O'Reilly will be aware of the fate of his fellow right-wing controversialist Don Imus, who was sacked by CBS five months ago when he referred to a black women's basketball team as "nappy-headed hos". Imus, who was also exposed by new media activists, has yet to be taken back on air.
The issue of how black people are represented by the media, as well as by themselves in terms of racial slurs by black rappers and comedians, reached Capitol Hill this week when a congressional committee opened a hearing entitled From Imus to Industry: the business of stereotypes and degrading images
A senior Fox executive said the latest row was "nothing more than left-wing outlets stirring up false racism accusations for ratings". O'Reilly himself sought to dampen the row by claiming his words were taken out of context.
Paul Waldman of Media Matters fired back: "If Bill O'Reilly got caught robbing a bank he would say he was taken out of context." - Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2007
